logo80lv
Articlesclick_arrow
Professional Services
Research
Talentsclick_arrow
Events
Workshops
Aboutclick_arrow
Order outsourcing
Advertiseplayer
profile_loginLogIn

Activision to Pay $23.4M Due to Loss in Patent Infringement Suit

"While we are disappointed, we believe there is a strong basis for appeal."

Microsoft's gaming sector appears to be in a storm of challenges, with the fresh news of Xbox imposing more cuts following the shutdown of four studios, and now Activision Blizzard on the hook for a $23.4 million patent infringement payout.

Reuters reported on May 6 that a Delaware federal jury ruled that Activision Blizzard owes $23.4 million in damages for infringing patents related to the multiplayer features in its blockbuster games — World of Warcraft, Call of Duty: Black Ops III, and Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.

Image Credit: Activision, World of Warcraft

The gaming giant has lost a long-standing nine-year patent infringement lawsuit to tech incubator Acceleration Bay, which initiated the legal action in 2015.

The dispute revolved around two patents related to the technology enabling the "simultaneous sharing of information" across multiple computers. Activision Blizzard refuted Acceleration Bay's claims, asserting that its technology functions differently and does not infringe the patents in question. 

Image Credit: Activision, Call of Duty: Black Ops III

However, the jury decided that Activision should pay $18 million for the infringement related to World of Warcraft and an additional $5.4 million for the infringement associated with the Call of Duty games.

Reacting to the verdict, an Activision spokesperson stated, "While we are disappointed, we believe there is a strong basis for appeal," adding, "We have never used the patented technologies at issue in our games."

Check out Reuter's report here and don't forget to join our 80 Level Talent platform and our Telegram channel, follow us on InstagramTwitter, and LinkedIn, where we share breakdowns, the latest news, awesome artworks, and more.

Join discussion

Comments 0

    You might also like

    We need your consent

    We use cookies on this website to make your browsing experience better. By using the site you agree to our use of cookies.Learn more